<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Will this Imac Computer work for me or is it overkill?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.dts-l.org/39/will-this-imac-computer-work-for-me-or-is-it-overkill/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.dts-l.org/39/will-this-imac-computer-work-for-me-or-is-it-overkill</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 08:26:07 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: dyyylllaannn</title>
		<link>http://www.dts-l.org/39/will-this-imac-computer-work-for-me-or-is-it-overkill/comment-page-1#comment-78</link>
		<dc:creator>dyyylllaannn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Aug 2009 21:20:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dts-l.org/39/will-this-imac-computer-work-for-me-or-is-it-overkill#comment-78</guid>
		<description>You&#039;d be paying waay too much for what you&#039;re going to be using it for. I&#039;d suggest downgrading the processor to and intel core 2 duo, hard drive down to around 200GB, and i think that should do it fro your needs. 
That 500GB HD is WWWAAAYYY too much, and the processor&#039;s usage would hardly ever get up past 45%.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;d be paying waay too much for what you&#8217;re going to be using it for. I&#8217;d suggest downgrading the processor to and intel core 2 duo, hard drive down to around 200GB, and i think that should do it fro your needs.<br />
That 500GB HD is WWWAAAYYY too much, and the processor&#8217;s usage would hardly ever get up past 45%.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: recentcoin2000</title>
		<link>http://www.dts-l.org/39/will-this-imac-computer-work-for-me-or-is-it-overkill/comment-page-1#comment-77</link>
		<dc:creator>recentcoin2000</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2009 13:56:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dts-l.org/39/will-this-imac-computer-work-for-me-or-is-it-overkill#comment-77</guid>
		<description>I agree.  It&#039;s total overkill for what you&#039;re doing.  Seriously, I could do what you&#039;re doing from my PDA.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree.  It&#8217;s total overkill for what you&#8217;re doing.  Seriously, I could do what you&#8217;re doing from my PDA.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: -Marlith-</title>
		<link>http://www.dts-l.org/39/will-this-imac-computer-work-for-me-or-is-it-overkill/comment-page-1#comment-76</link>
		<dc:creator>-Marlith-</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2009 10:26:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dts-l.org/39/will-this-imac-computer-work-for-me-or-is-it-overkill#comment-76</guid>
		<description>Definitely overkill, I would suggest sticking to a macbook or the smaller iMac. Stay away from mac mini and the real overkill computers like the Mac Pro and the MacBook Pro</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Definitely overkill, I would suggest sticking to a macbook or the smaller iMac. Stay away from mac mini and the real overkill computers like the Mac Pro and the MacBook Pro</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nator419</title>
		<link>http://www.dts-l.org/39/will-this-imac-computer-work-for-me-or-is-it-overkill/comment-page-1#comment-75</link>
		<dc:creator>nator419</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2009 06:07:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dts-l.org/39/will-this-imac-computer-work-for-me-or-is-it-overkill#comment-75</guid>
		<description>I would go with the lesser one for what your using it for. you will be lucky if you ever use 100 GB of your HD and you don&#039;t need much RAM for what you want either or processing speed though 2.4 and 2.8 are pretty close anyway.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would go with the lesser one for what your using it for. you will be lucky if you ever use 100 GB of your HD and you don&#8217;t need much RAM for what you want either or processing speed though 2.4 and 2.8 are pretty close anyway.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: darthgeeku</title>
		<link>http://www.dts-l.org/39/will-this-imac-computer-work-for-me-or-is-it-overkill/comment-page-1#comment-74</link>
		<dc:creator>darthgeeku</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2009 21:37:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dts-l.org/39/will-this-imac-computer-work-for-me-or-is-it-overkill#comment-74</guid>
		<description>Overkill!!! I could spec out a DIY PC that would fit your needs and cost you under $1k with OS and LCD in?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Overkill!!! I could spec out a DIY PC that would fit your needs and cost you under $1k with OS and LCD in?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
